About your Search

20130121
20130129
Search Results 0 to 9 of about 10 (some duplicates have been removed)
heard and what we will hear tomorrow. steve hayes senior writer, juan williams fox news political analysts and charles krauthammer syndicated columnist. steve to you, this is a different environment, a different time, they needed a little bit of money. they opened it to corporate donations. you heard the president going there to say thank you for the money. >> yeah he didn't need to be re-elected this time. they are having a good time tonight. they are joking with each other and the crowd. there were moments joe biden was speaking he had the crowd fired up when he said president obama is just getting started. he repeated himself twice he is just getting started. he laid out policy agenda guns immigration and rebooting the economy and barack obama came on and was in a joef yell mood. >> for all of the talk we had during the campaign ofment o prt obama's ability to raise money it would be a million dollar campaign and the talk mitt romney had more corporate donors it would be a wash in cash. the president had no trouble raising enough money to get himself re-elected it is thanks in
talking about it on the show. bring in the panel. steve hayes for weekly standard. juan williams, columnist with the hill. syndicated columnist charles krauthammer. charles? >> i thought it was a remarkable exchange. what difference? the difference is between truth and falsehood, and she should be indig nant about somebody who wants to point out the difference is remarkable. administration that in the middle of a campaign is running on the killing of bin laden and running on the spun story that with bin laden dead, al-qaeda in retreat. and simply will not admit with two months to go in the campaign, there was a story that contradicted that. they were active and well in north africa. of course it's important. i think she is really good. i have to confess that. by actually going on the attack. she disarms her opponent. as brit hume pointed out earlier,be when you are facing the committees where there is no sequential followups, where half of the members are just making speeches, you can get away with a lot. she was able time and again, to do that time honored trick of saying well,
it live in a second. as he does,be bring in the expanded panel. steve hayes for the stand stand. kirsten powers, columnist for daily beast. charles lane opinion writer for the "washington post." syndicated columnist charles krauthammer. be forewarned i want to take a shot as he walks by the camera. steve, listen, analysts left and right, read a lot today characterized this as liberal, progressive. speech that was forward leaning for this president. your thoughts? >> i think it's right. brit hume's characterization earlier during his commentary got it about right. there has been sort of a long-running debate, the past four years in washington, among journalists and others about whether the president is fundamentally a pragmatist or idealogue. this makes clear he is an idealogue and he has been all along with occasional nod toward pragmatism. what struck me about the speech, it was basically a 2 # 00 word sell -- 2200 word activist of government and the good that government can do. it paid scant attention to the cost of -- >> bret: wait a second. >> thank you, sir. appreciate you. thank yo
it on the panel. steve hayes for "weekly standard." a.b. stoddard of the hill. syndicated columnist charles krauthammer. charles? >> this is a really important deal, i think. when you heard the press secretary say it is one decision by one court on one case, that is what you always say when you lose. this is the most important of the circuit courts. this is the hugely important decision. first, just psychologically and politically. it's the first setback obama has had. he has been riding high on everything. victory after victory. this is an important setback. it's likely to temper their pension for ruling through executive orders. and by administrative actions. to go around congress. this is a rebuke. saying that we were saying at the time. these are lawless appointments. the senate was not in recess. >> bret: explain this. thenate was in a pro forma session. the republicans kept it in pro forma session. they were doing some things. they were moving some things along. some things were moving through. it wasn't a full session. democrats were refuting that. the president said they were re --
and he is a big donor and employee. it seemed weird. full of conflict. the steve croft interview was interesting when you hear him asking the question, why did you want to do this? almost like a bubble over his head why did i agree to do this? it was kind of tough piece exit interview pat on the head for hillary. he played along from what we can tell. >> bret: exit interviews are one thing. at the end of two terms, looking back over two terms. one of those things. and you ask questions, reflective. the president tarting a second term in the middle of controversy. the secretary of state just come off controversial testimony on capitol hill. there are hot spots all over the world. few questions to ask that probably could be more pointed. >> when you think of all the things, yes, all the ground that wasn't covered, whether it was syria or benghazi or for that matter budget battle. we haven't heard them stay anything about that. dieing to hear what he has to say. i gas he is having a second honeymoon. >> i love to hear the president whine of fox news and talk radio. we should be prou
to protect. [applause] >> there are a lot of states, if i can, steve, a lot of states are saying, they're fot going fot-- not going to enforce this, don't you dare try to take away a citizen in our state's rights. texas, oklahoma-- >> and yeah, except for new york, d.c. and california, right, go ahead. >> disgraceful what the president has done and disgraceful that these children that advertise that we're going to remove all of these guns. you go back to 1930's with hitler, he did the same thing. >> sean: isn't that -- isn't that what a lot, we don't talk a lot about. what were the intentions of our founders and framers, we have stalin, we have hitler, we have countries tyrannical, they talked a lot about that and so people say, if you mention that in this day and age, that's extreme. >> and this is exactly right, sean, and what you have here is a lot of empty rhetoric, a lot of posturing, and posing and props as you referenced earlier. all the unborn guns, if another gun was never sold in america, starting at seven o'clock. they're already in play, there's millions in play, in the bac
Search Results 0 to 9 of about 10 (some duplicates have been removed)